tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4147270569967420484.post9188083006887473447..comments2023-11-05T04:14:03.629-06:00Comments on Cybercrime Review: Second Circuit reverses restitution award in CP case, explains proper formula for calculating the amountJeffrey Brownhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/04763378835158069885noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-4147270569967420484.post-43030252965090141522013-01-10T08:05:29.397-06:002013-01-10T08:05:29.397-06:00There are several logical issues with this. First,...There are several logical issues with this. First, her representative informs her of the case and she writes that that causes actual and ongoing psychological harm. The obvious issue is testing confirmation bias. If the representative informed her of a case that either was fictitious or where the defendant was actually innocent, she would most likely have the same reaction despite no actual liability on the part of the defendant. Therefore if the reaction is the same regardless of the defendant's actions, the harm (if it exists, but let's assume it does) comes from something else, namely the representative's informing of the victim. If that informing process is what causes harm, why is the government perpetuating it?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com