We have discussed previously the tension between a wide and narrow reading of the CFAA - see Jeffrey's original take on Nosal - Ninth Circuit en banc adopts narrow reading of CFAA, and my analysis of the dissent - Why Nosal’s dissent is surprisingly persuasive.
Well, the Fourth Circuit has sided with the "narrow" camp, in WEC Carolina Energy Solutions v. Miller. Not surprisingly, it is another case of employee disloyalty that has been dressed up to be a federal hacking violation. Essentially, Miller (or his assistant) downloaded...